- To
- Adult, wellness and nightlife brand teams
- From
- BrandAfterdark
- Re
- Data
- Date
- · 6 min read
Data-led PR for adult brands: surveys and first-party data that hold up
Original data is one of the few things an adult brand can offer a reporter that nobody else has. It only works if the numbers survive a skeptical editor: a real question, an honest sample, and full disclosure.
Why data works for adult brands
Reporters are cautious about adult brands, and they should be. Data changes the conversation. A finding about how people date, shop or stay safe is news on its own terms, and the brand becomes the source rather than the subject. Journalists in Muck Rack's State of Journalism 2026 ranked original data among the most valuable things a pitch can include.
The catch is that data stories are checked harder than any other kind. A number that falls apart under one question can end a relationship with a reporter.
Start with a question worth answering
Begin with something a reporter's readers would want to know, not with the answer your brand hopes for. Good questions are specific and current: how many adults check a date's identity before meeting, how people feel about age-verification rules, what stops people buying a wellness product. Write the questions neutrally. Leading wording is the first thing an editor looks for.
Two sources of numbers
- A commissioned survey. An independent research firm asks a defined group, such as US adults, a short set of questions. Around 1,000 respondents is common for a national story.
- Your own first-party data. Anonymized, aggregated patterns from how people use your product. Often more interesting than a survey, and more sensitive.
With first-party data, publish patterns, never records. Remove any group small enough to identify, and make sure the use fits your privacy policy before anything leaves the building.
Disclose everything a skeptic would ask
The American Association for Public Opinion Research sets out what a published survey should disclose. Its minimum list includes:
Methods note
- Who sponsored the survey and who conducted it
- The exact wording of every question reported
- The population surveyed and how respondents were recruited
- Total sample size, method and dates of data collection
- Any weighting, and an estimate of sampling error where it applies
Put this note at the bottom of every release and on a page of your site. A reporter who can check the method has a reason to trust the number.
Be careful with margin of error
Many brand surveys use online opt-in panels, where people sign up to take surveys. AAPOR guidance says it is best to avoid the term "margin of error" with samples like these, because they are not random draws from the population. Say that respondents opted in, describe any weighting, and let the method speak for itself.
If 31% said yes, write 31% or "nearly a third", not "a third" and never "most". Reporters compare the headline to the table.
From numbers to a pitch
Pick the one finding that surprises, and lead with it. Offer the full table, a named spokesperson who can explain it, and a chart a reporter can reuse. How that pitch should read is set out in media pitching, and an annotated example is on our media outreach page. Data campaigns are also a core part of adult digital PR.
Survey design at a glance
| Choice | Good practice |
|---|---|
| Sample | Adults only, a defined population, size stated |
| Panel | Name the provider and whether it is opt-in |
| Questions | Neutral wording, published in full |
| Weighting | Say whether results are weighted and to what |
| Timing | Field dates stated |
First-party data and privacy
Brand data, such as anonymised order trends, can make strong stories, but it describes real people. Aggregate it, remove anything that could identify individuals, avoid small groups where a person could be singled out, and check that your privacy notice allows this use. Never publish data about sensitive behaviour at a level of detail that could expose customers.
Working with a research firm
An independent research firm adds credibility and handles fieldwork properly. Agree the questions together, let the firm advise on wording, and publish their name with the results. A firm that will not let its name appear is a warning sign. Budget for the firm's fee and for the time to turn results into a story.
Presenting data to journalists
Send one clear chart, the headline finding in a sentence, and the full method on a single page. Offer the raw tables on request. Journalists appreciate data they can check and reuse; they distrust findings that arrive only as a press release. Avoid charts that exaggerate, such as truncated axes.
Repeating a study
Running the same survey each year creates a series that reporters return to. Keep questions identical, note any change in method, and publish at the same time each year. Year-on-year changes become stories in themselves. Expert commentary to go with the data is covered in expert commentary.
Sample size and certainty
Larger samples narrow the uncertainty around a finding, but online opt-in panels do not support a classical margin of error. Describe the sample honestly, avoid splitting results into small sub-groups that cannot bear the weight, and present differences between groups only when they are large enough to matter. A smaller, honest claim is more likely to be published and trusted than a dramatic one that collapses under scrutiny.
Questions to avoid
Leading questions ("How much do you love...?"), double questions that ask two things at once, and questions about illegal activity or minors have no place in a brand survey. Neither do questions that could distress respondents without care, such as those about abuse. Keep surveys short, neutral and respectful; respondents are people sharing private views.
A worked example
Picture this. A lingerie brand commissions a survey of 1,500 US adults on bra fit. The finding that most respondents had never been measured professionally leads the pitch, with the full question wording and panel details attached. Two lifestyle outlets run it; one health site asks for an expert interview. The following year, the same survey shows a change, which becomes a second story.
Sharing data with reporters
Offer the full data tables to any reporter who asks, under clear terms of use. Name a contact who can answer method questions on the day of publication. Correct any errors in your own release immediately and openly. Reporters remember sources whose numbers held up, and they come back to them for the next story. Angles that suit data are covered in adult PR story angles.
Ethics and consent
Respondents must know who is asking and why, and agree to take part. Avoid collecting names or contact details you do not need.
In short
Ask a question readers care about, use an independent firm or careful first-party data, disclose the method fully, report findings exactly, and repeat the study to build a series. Spokespeople who can explain the numbers are covered in expert commentary.
Background sources
Original publishers of the facts in this guide; worth a look before any decision.
On the record: questions
Around 1,000 US adults is a common size for a national story, and it leaves room to report on large subgroups. Smaller samples can work for a narrow audience, as long as you say so.
Yes, but report it as a survey of your customers, not of Americans. Reporters will ask who answered, and the honest answer protects the story.
Only in aggregate, with no individual traceable, and in line with your privacy policy. Publish patterns, never records, and leave out any group small enough to identify.